Preparing a community for a natural disaster is a long-term incremental endeavor that most do not want to participate in. It is only after a crisis that the work is appreciated. For a structured approach that will keep everyone on the same page, an incident management training class is ideal.
It is a responsibility of government to prepare for contingencies and prepare their populations as well as they can for these unpredictable events. This is normally accomplished with the historical record of catastrophes and the analysis of other threats to the area. Processes and procedures are defined to counter the probable conditions one would expect in such situations.
Recent catastrophes have shed light on a seeming inability to handle serious crises if they are larger than the local resources can handle. The bombing in Oklahoma, carried out by a domestic terrorist highlighted weaknesses in the approach to disasters. What the country needed was a single approach to crisis management that could be applied everywhere interchangeably.
Especially because not every community is the same size, the ability to handle a crisis will vary. Each community usually prepares specifically for the problems they anticipate facing. This can leave them even more vulnerable to any crisis that springs up and surprises them, such as when an active shooter causes mass casualties or a terrorist decides to use an explosive device in a crowd.
Consistency of function was a driving issue, with the goal to establish a structure of modules, each with a specified capability. By mandating each module have the same capability, an on scene commander could quickly and confidently request the exact increment of capability needed. Any municipality nearby would be able to provide what was needed in an orderly fashion.
All of this presupposes that the individual who have the expertise and qualifications understand their role. For the most part these are not permanent positions, but rather people with the right skills who are recruited or volunteer to participate in community readiness. Fitting into the structure of the emergency response system requires additional education on their own time.
Critics of the new approach lamented the loss of individual approaches to problems based on the specific knowledge of the area and cultures affected. While the response to a disaster is affected by the circumstances under which it occurs, a standard approach means an effective way to size the response. The key ingredient for success was to get all the individuals involved in contingency resolution trained to the same level.
In addition to changes in the way each team operated and managed their response team, they also had to ensure they had equivalent equipment, which also required training. Getting this deployed across the country was a huge task, complicated by the fact that many emergency responders were volunteers from all walks of life. The key to success was having the member attend a standardized incident management training class.
It is a responsibility of government to prepare for contingencies and prepare their populations as well as they can for these unpredictable events. This is normally accomplished with the historical record of catastrophes and the analysis of other threats to the area. Processes and procedures are defined to counter the probable conditions one would expect in such situations.
Recent catastrophes have shed light on a seeming inability to handle serious crises if they are larger than the local resources can handle. The bombing in Oklahoma, carried out by a domestic terrorist highlighted weaknesses in the approach to disasters. What the country needed was a single approach to crisis management that could be applied everywhere interchangeably.
Especially because not every community is the same size, the ability to handle a crisis will vary. Each community usually prepares specifically for the problems they anticipate facing. This can leave them even more vulnerable to any crisis that springs up and surprises them, such as when an active shooter causes mass casualties or a terrorist decides to use an explosive device in a crowd.
Consistency of function was a driving issue, with the goal to establish a structure of modules, each with a specified capability. By mandating each module have the same capability, an on scene commander could quickly and confidently request the exact increment of capability needed. Any municipality nearby would be able to provide what was needed in an orderly fashion.
All of this presupposes that the individual who have the expertise and qualifications understand their role. For the most part these are not permanent positions, but rather people with the right skills who are recruited or volunteer to participate in community readiness. Fitting into the structure of the emergency response system requires additional education on their own time.
Critics of the new approach lamented the loss of individual approaches to problems based on the specific knowledge of the area and cultures affected. While the response to a disaster is affected by the circumstances under which it occurs, a standard approach means an effective way to size the response. The key ingredient for success was to get all the individuals involved in contingency resolution trained to the same level.
In addition to changes in the way each team operated and managed their response team, they also had to ensure they had equivalent equipment, which also required training. Getting this deployed across the country was a huge task, complicated by the fact that many emergency responders were volunteers from all walks of life. The key to success was having the member attend a standardized incident management training class.
About the Author:
You can visit the website www.signetnorthamerica.com for more helpful information about Help Prepare For Terrorism With An Incident Management Training Class
0 comments:
Post a Comment