To millions of Americans, the justice arrangement of the nation is pillared on the jury system. The method upholds the right of every citizen and grants fairness and impartiality in court cases. However, many Americans have come to believe that the purpose of the jury method has been abused. A number of verdicts have been reached by the system have angered some people. These are some of the reasons why some people feel it is time for American trial jury reform.
The main purpose of the judging method is to help in investigations with a view of combating crime while protecting the rights of citizens. Some may argue that the system has never failed in acting as a sword and held. However, leaving the method in its current form will cause more problems than one would imagine. It will be going against the principles of the American justice arrangement.
There some people who see the method as the fairest way of serving justice. Proponents of the arrangement argue that in its absence, the fate of the accused is at the mercy of professional judges. It is further argued that judges are unable to look at the case from a different angle although they are an integral part of justice arrangement. Jurors bring a different look that will ensure justice is served for the plaintiff and defendant.
Although there have been some efforts made in some quarters, there is nothing to show on the arrangement itself. About two decades ago, the American Bar Association prompted Congress to initiate moves to change the judging arrangement. After a lot of work in the Congress, nothing was achieved with regard to making the anticipated changes.
Over the years, the digit of prosecutors that are in American court has soared. At the same there has been a loss in the control of grand jury abuse. As a result there has been many people who have been prosecuted wrongly. Lives and destinies have been shattered erroneously. Protecting the rights of the citizens was one of the objectives of the grand jury. Perhaps it is time to do something to get things back on course.
Some people call for the total elimination of jurors from the American justice method while others support reforms. One of the reform proposals that have become popular is the need to stop from forcing jurors to have unanimous verdicts. Some states have already made this implementation with regard to civil cases. Soon non-unanimous decisions may be allowed in criminal cases too. Proponents of these changes believe the arrangement operations will be smooth.
Many Americans have lost confidence in the arrangement with a majority not willing to take part in them. This loss of confidence may have resulted from how a number of cases have been handled in the last 40 or so years. The society has also evolved massively, which calls for the judging method to accommodate these changes.
The society is changing and embracing new values fast. The judging arrangement should embrace the changes in the society so that the two can work in tandem. These changes will help ensure that people do not have negative attitudes towards judgments reached by the judges. Some states have already taken the initiative and made changes especially in civil cases.
The main purpose of the judging method is to help in investigations with a view of combating crime while protecting the rights of citizens. Some may argue that the system has never failed in acting as a sword and held. However, leaving the method in its current form will cause more problems than one would imagine. It will be going against the principles of the American justice arrangement.
There some people who see the method as the fairest way of serving justice. Proponents of the arrangement argue that in its absence, the fate of the accused is at the mercy of professional judges. It is further argued that judges are unable to look at the case from a different angle although they are an integral part of justice arrangement. Jurors bring a different look that will ensure justice is served for the plaintiff and defendant.
Although there have been some efforts made in some quarters, there is nothing to show on the arrangement itself. About two decades ago, the American Bar Association prompted Congress to initiate moves to change the judging arrangement. After a lot of work in the Congress, nothing was achieved with regard to making the anticipated changes.
Over the years, the digit of prosecutors that are in American court has soared. At the same there has been a loss in the control of grand jury abuse. As a result there has been many people who have been prosecuted wrongly. Lives and destinies have been shattered erroneously. Protecting the rights of the citizens was one of the objectives of the grand jury. Perhaps it is time to do something to get things back on course.
Some people call for the total elimination of jurors from the American justice method while others support reforms. One of the reform proposals that have become popular is the need to stop from forcing jurors to have unanimous verdicts. Some states have already made this implementation with regard to civil cases. Soon non-unanimous decisions may be allowed in criminal cases too. Proponents of these changes believe the arrangement operations will be smooth.
Many Americans have lost confidence in the arrangement with a majority not willing to take part in them. This loss of confidence may have resulted from how a number of cases have been handled in the last 40 or so years. The society has also evolved massively, which calls for the judging method to accommodate these changes.
The society is changing and embracing new values fast. The judging arrangement should embrace the changes in the society so that the two can work in tandem. These changes will help ensure that people do not have negative attitudes towards judgments reached by the judges. Some states have already taken the initiative and made changes especially in civil cases.
About the Author:
You can visit tunno.com for more helpful information about Reasons For American Trial Jury Reform.
0 comments:
Post a Comment